Here R is the scalar curvature of the metric and and are projections of the energy-momentum tensor. Assuming matter fields which satisfy the dominant energy condition implies that . This means that the trivial procedure of making an arbitrary choice of and and defining and by equations (1) and (2) is of no use for producing physically interesting solutions.
The usual method for solving the equations (1) and (2) is the conformal method. In this method parts of the data (the so-called free data) are chosen, and the constraints imply four elliptic equations for the remaining parts. The case which has been studied most is the constant mean curvature (CMC) case, where is constant. In that case there is an important simplification. Three of the elliptic equations, which form a linear system, decouple from the remaining one. This last equation, which is nonlinear, but scalar, is called the Lichnerowicz equation. The heart of the existence theory for the constraints in the CMC case is the theory of the Lichnerowicz equation.
Solving an elliptic equation is a non-local problem and so boundary conditions or asymptotic conditions are important. For the constraints the cases most frequently considered in the literature are that where S is compact (so that no boundary conditions are needed) and that where the free data satisfy some asymptotic flatness conditions. In the CMC case the problem is well understood for both kinds of boundary conditions[12, 29, 49]. The other case which has been studied in detail is that of hyperboloidal data . The kind of theorem which is obtained is that sufficiently differentiable free data, in some cases required to satisfy some global restrictions, can be completed in a unique way to a solution of the constraints.
In the non-CMC case our understanding is much more limited although some results have been obtained in recent years (see  and references therein.) It is an important open problem to extend these so that an overview is obtained comparable to that available in the CMC case. Progress on this could also lead to a better understanding of the question, when a spacetime which admits a compact, or asymptotically flat, Cauchy surface also admits one of constant mean curvature. Up to now there are only isolated examples which exhibit obstructions to the existence of CMC hypersurfaces.
It would be interesting to know whether there is a useful concept of the most general physically reasonable solutions of the constraints representing regular initial configurations. Data of this kind should not themselves contain singularities. Thus it seems reasonable to suppose at least that the metric is complete and that the length of , as measured using , is bounded. Does the existence of solutions of the constraints imply a restriction on the topology of S or on the asymptotic geometry of the data? This question is largely open, and it seems that information is available only in the compact and asymptotically flat cases. In the case of compact S, where there is no asymptotic regime, there is known to be no topological restriction. In the asymptotically flat case there is also no topological restriction implied by the constraints beyond that implied by the condition of asymptotic flatness itself. This shows in particular that any manifold which is obtained by deleting a point from a compact manifold admits a solution of the constraints satisfying the minimal conditions demanded above. A starting point for going beyond this could be the study of data which are asymptotically homogeneous. For instance, the Schwarzschild solution contains interesting CMC hypersurfaces which are asymptotic to the product of a 2-sphere with the real line. More general data of this kind could be useful for the study of the dynamics of black hole interiors.
To sum up, the constraints are well understood in the compact, asymptotically flat and hyperboloidal cases under the constant mean curvature assumption, and only in these cases.
|Local and global existence theorems for the Einstein
Alan D. Rendall
© Max-Planck-Gesellschaft. ISSN 1433-8351
Problems/Comments to firstname.lastname@example.org