The appropriate perturbation equations in this limit are easily derived for a background FLRW expanding model, assuming a metric of the form
where andThe governing equations in the Newtonian limit are the hydrodynamic conservation equations,
the geodesic equations for collisionless dust or dark matter (in comoving coordinates), Poisson’s equation for the gravitational potential, and the Friedman equation for the cosmological scale factor, HereAn alternative total energy conservative form of the hydrodynamics equations that allows high resolution Godunov-type shock capturing techniques is
with the corresponding particle and gravity equations where
The baryonic equations from the previous section are easily extended to include reactive chemistry of both
atomic and molecular species (e.g.,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
, and
) by
assuming a common flow field, supplementing the total mass conservation equation (68
) with
A fairly complete chemical network system useful for primordial gas phase compositions, including hydrogen molecules, consists of the following collisional, photoionization, and photodissociation chains
|
|
|||
| (1) | |
||
| (2) | |
||
| (3) | |
||
| (4) | |
||
| (5) | |
||
| (6) | |||
|
|
|||
| (7) | |
||
| (8) | |
||
| (9) | |
||
| (10) | |
||
| (11) | |
||
| (12) | |
||
| (13) | |
||
| (14) | |
||
| (15) | |
||
| (16) | |
||
| (17) | |
||
| (18) | |||
| (19) | |||
|
|
|||
| (20) | |
||
| (21) | |
||
| (22) | |
||
|
|
|||
| (23) | |
||
| (24) | |
||
| (25) | |
||
| (26) | |
||
| (27) | |
||
For a comprehensive description of the chemistry and explicit formulas modeling the kinetic and cooling
rates relevant for cosmological calculations, the reader is referred to [92, 144, 54, 1
, 21
]. This reactive
network is by no means complete, and in fact, ignores important coolants and contaminants (e.g., HD, LiH,
and their intermediary products [151, 78, 48]) expected to form through non-equilibrium reactions at low
temperatures and high densities. Although it is certainly possible to include even in three dimensional
simulations, the inclusion of more complex reactants demands either more computational resources (to
resolve both the chemistry and cooling scales) or an increasing reliance on equilibrium assumptions which
can be very inaccurate.
Many numerical techniques have been developed to solve the hydrodynamic and collisionless
particle equations. For the hydrodynamic equations, the methods range from Lagrangian SPH
algorithms with artificial viscosity [72, 88], to high resolution shock capturing Eulerian techniques
on single static meshes [142, 134], nested grids [19], moving meshes [82], and adaptive mesh
refinement [51]. For the dark matter equations, the canonical choices are treecodes [159] or PM and P3M
methods [90, 68
], although many variants have been developed to optimize computational
performance and accuracy, including adaptive mesh, particle, and smoothing kernel refinement
methods [45, 77
, 130]. An efficient method for solving non-equilibrium, multi-species chemical reactive
flows together with the hydrodynamic equations in a background FLRW model is described
in [1, 21].
It is beyond the scope of this review to discuss algorithmic details of the different methods and their
strengths and weaknesses. Instead, the reader is referred to [103
, 77
] for thorough comparisons of various
numerical methods applied to problems of structure formation. Kang et al. [103] compare (by binning data
at different resolutions) the statistical performance of five codes (three Eulerian and two SPH) on the
problem of an evolving CDM Universe on large scales using the same initial data. The results
indicate that global averages of physical attributes converge in rebinned data, but that some
uncertainties remain at small levels. Frenk et al. [77] compare twelve Lagrangian and Eulerian
hydrodynamics codes to resolve the formation of a single X-ray cluster in a CDM Universe. The study
finds generally good agreement for both dynamical and thermodynamical quantities, but also
shows significant differences in the X-ray luminosity, a quantity that is especially sensitive to
resolution [17].
The standard Zel’dovich solution [165, 68] is commonly used to generate initial conditions satisfying observed or theoretical power spectra of matter density fluctuations. Comoving physical displacements and velocities of the collisionless dark matter particles are set according to the power spectrum realization
where the complex phases are chosen from a gaussian random field,Overdensity peaks can be filtered on specified spatial or mass scales by Gaussian smoothing the random density field [27]
on a comoving scaleBertschinger [44] has provided a useful and publicly available package of programs called COSMICS for computing transfer functions, CMB anisotropies, and gaussian random initial conditions for numerical structure formation calculations. The package solves the coupled linearized Einstein, Boltzman, and fluid equations for scalar metric perturbations, photons, neutrinos, baryons, and collisionless dark matter in a background isotropic Universe. It also generates constrained or unconstrained matter distributions over arbitrarily specifiable spatial or mass scales.
| http://www.livingreviews.org/lrr-2001-2 |
© Max Planck Society and the author(s)
Problems/comments to |