2.2 The vacuum evolution equations2 Local Existence2 Local Existence

2.1 The constraints 

The unknowns in the constraint equations are the initial data for the Einstein equations. These consist of a three-dimensional manifold S, a Riemannian metric tex2html_wrap_inline1693, and a symmetric tensor tex2html_wrap_inline1695 on S, and initial data for any matter fields present. The equations are:


Here R is the scalar curvature of the metric tex2html_wrap_inline1693, and tex2html_wrap_inline1703 and tex2html_wrap_inline1705 are projections of the energy-momentum tensor. Assuming that the matter fields satisfy the dominant energy condition implies that tex2html_wrap_inline1707 . This means that the trivial procedure of making an arbitrary choice of tex2html_wrap_inline1693 and tex2html_wrap_inline1695 and defining tex2html_wrap_inline1703 and tex2html_wrap_inline1705 by Equations (1Popup Equation) is of no use for producing physically interesting solutions.

The usual method for solving the Equations (1Popup Equation) is the conformal method [66Jump To The Next Citation Point In The Article]. In this method parts of the data (the so-called free data) are chosen, and the constraints imply four elliptic equations for the remaining parts. The case that has been studied the most is the constant mean curvature (CMC) case, where tex2html_wrap_inline1717 is constant. In that case there is an important simplification. Three of the elliptic equations, which form a linear system, decouple from the remaining one. This last equation, which is nonlinear, but scalar, is called the Lichnerowicz equation. The heart of the existence theory for the constraints in the CMC case is the theory of the Lichnerowicz equation.

Solving an elliptic equation is a non-local problem and so boundary conditions or asymptotic conditions are important. For the constraints, the cases most frequently considered in the literature are that where S is compact (so that no boundary conditions are needed) and that where the free data satisfy some asymptotic flatness conditions. In the CMC case the problem is well understood for both kinds of boundary conditions [52, 81Jump To The Next Citation Point In The Article, 137]. The other case that has been studied in detail is that of hyperboloidal data [4]. The kind of theorem that is obtained is that sufficiently differentiable free data, in some cases required to satisfy some global restrictions, can be completed in a unique way to a solution of the constraints. It should be noted in passing that in certain cases physically interesting free data may not be ``sufficiently differentiable'' in the sense it is meant here. One such case is mentioned at the end of Section  2.6 . The usual kinds of differentiability conditions that are required in the study of the constraints involve the free data belonging to suitable Sobolev or Hölder spaces. Sobolev spaces have the advantage that they fit well with the theory of the evolution equations (compare the discussion in Section  2.2). In the literature nobody seems to have focussed on the question of the minimal differentiability necessary to apply the conformal method.

In the non-CMC case our understanding is much more limited although some results have been obtained in recent years (see [140, 64] and references therein). It is an important open problem to extend these so that an overview is obtained comparable to that available in the CMC case. Progress on this could also lead to a better understanding of the question of whether a spacetime that admits a compact, or asymptotically flat, Cauchy surface also admits one of constant mean curvature. Up to now there have been only isolated examples that exhibit obstructions to the existence of CMC hypersurfaces [21].

It would be interesting to know whether there is a useful concept of the most general physically reasonable solutions of the constraints representing regular initial configurations. Data of this kind should not themselves contain singularities. Thus it seems reasonable to suppose at least that the metric tex2html_wrap_inline1693 is complete and that the length of tex2html_wrap_inline1695, as measured using tex2html_wrap_inline1693, is bounded. Does the existence of solutions of the constraints imply a restriction on the topology of S or on the asymptotic geometry of the data? This question is largely open, and it seems that information is available only in the compact and asymptotically flat cases. In the case of compact S, where there is no asymptotic regime, there is known to be no topological restriction. In the asymptotically flat case there is also no topological restriction implied by the constraints beyond that implied by the condition of asymptotic flatness itself [241]. This shows in particular that any manifold that is obtained by deleting a point from a compact manifold admits a solution of the constraints satisfying the minimal conditions demanded above. A starting point for going beyond this could be the study of data that are asymptotically homogeneous. For instance, the Schwarzschild solution contains interesting CMC hypersurfaces that are asymptotic to the metric product of a round 2-sphere with the real line. More general data of this kind could be useful for the study of the dynamics of black hole interiors [209Jump To The Next Citation Point In The Article].

To sum up, the conformal approach to solving the constraints, which has been the standard one up to now, is well understood in the compact, asymptotically flat and hyperboloidal cases under the constant mean curvature assumption, and only in these cases. For some other approaches see [22, 23, 245]. New techniques have been applied by Corvino [90] to prove the existence of regular solutions of the vacuum constraints on tex2html_wrap_inline1731 that are Schwarzschild outside a compact set.

2.2 The vacuum evolution equations2 Local Existence2 Local Existence

image Theorems on Existence and Global Dynamics for the Einstein Equations
Alan D. Rendall
© Max-Planck-Gesellschaft. ISSN 1433-8351
Problems/Comments to livrev@aei-potsdam.mpg.de