We are given a background spacetime for which the metric satisfies the Einstein field equations in vacuum. We then perturb the metric from to

The metric perturbation is assumed to be small, and when working out the Einstein field equations to be satisfied by the new metric , we work consistently to first order in . To simplify the expressions we use the trace-reversed potentials defined by and we impose the Lorenz gauge condition, In this equation, and in all others below, indices are raised and lowered with the background metric . Similarly, the connection involved in Equation (348), and in all other equations below, is the one that is compatible with the background metric. If is the perturbing stress-energy tensor, then by virtue of the linearized Einstein field equations the perturbation field obeys the wave equation in which is the wave operator and the Riemann tensor. In first-order perturbation theory, the stress-energy tensor must be conserved in the background spacetime: .The solution to the wave equation is written as

in terms of a Green’s function that satisfies [53] where is a parallel propagator and an invariant Dirac functional. The parallel propagators are inserted on the right-hand side of Equation (351) to keep the index structure of the equation consistent from side to side; in particular, both sides of the equation are symmetric in and , and in and . It is easy to check that by virtue of Equation (351), the perturbation field of Equation (350) satisfies the wave equation of Equation (349). Once is known, the metric perturbation can be reconstructed from the relation .We will assume that the retarded Green’s function , which is nonzero if is in the causal future of , and the advanced Green’s function , which is nonzero if is in the causal past of , exist as distributions and can be defined globally in the entire background spacetime.

Assuming throughout this section that is in the normal convex neighbourhood of , we make the ansatz

where , are the light-cone distributions introduced in Section 4.2.2, and where , are smooth bitensors.To conveniently manipulate the Green’s functions we shift by a small positive quantity . The Green’s functions are then recovered by the taking the limit of

as . When we substitute this into the left-hand side of Equation (351) and then take the limit, we obtain

- the equations and that determine ;
- the equation that determines , the restriction of on the light cone ; and
- the wave equation that determines inside the light cone.

Equation (354) can be integrated along the unique geodesic that links to . The initial conditions are provided by Equation (353), and if we set , we find that these equations reduce to Equations (272) and (271), respectively. According to Equation (273), then, we have

which reduces to near coincidence, with denoting the affine-parameter distance between and ; there is no term of order because, by assumption, the background Ricci tensor vanishes at (as it does in the entire spacetime). Differentiation of this relation gives and eventually, this last result follows from the fact that is antisymmetric in the last pair of indices.Similarly, Equation (355) can be integrated along each null geodesic that generates the null cone . The initial values are obtained by taking the coincidence limit of this equation, using Equations (353), (361), and the additional relation . We arrive at

With the characteristic data obtained by integrating Equation (355), the wave equation of Equation (356) admits a unique solution.To summarize, the retarded and advanced gravitational Green’s functions are given by Equation (352) with given by Equation (357) and determined by Equation (356), and the characteristic data constructed with Equations (355) and (362). It should be emphasized that the construction provided in this section is restricted to , the normal convex neighbourhood of the reference point .

The (globally defined) gravitational Green’s functions satisfy the reciprocity relation

The derivation of this result is virtually identical to what was presented in Sections 4.3.3 and 4.4.3. A direct consequence of the reciprocity relation is the statementThe Kirchhoff representation for the trace-reversed gravitational perturbation is formulated as follows. Suppose that satisfies the homogeneous version of Equation (349) and that initial values , are specified on a spacelike hypersurface . Then the value of the perturbation field at a point in the future of is given by

where is a surface element on ; is the future-directed unit normal and is the invariant volume element on the hypersurface. The derivation of Equation (365) is virtually identical to what was presented in Sections 4.3.4 and 4.4.3.

We shall now construct singular and radiative Green’s functions for the linearized gravitational field. The treatment here parallels closely what was presented in Sections 4.3.5 and 4.4.4.

We begin by introducing the bitensor with properties

Gr.H1: satisfies the homogeneous wave equation,

Gr.H2: is symmetric in its indices and arguments,

Gr.H3: agrees with the retarded Green’s function if is in the chronological future of ,

Gr.H4: agrees with the advanced Green’s function if is in the chronological past of ,

It is easy to prove that Property Gr.H4 follows from Property Gr.H2, Property Gr.H3, and the reciprocity relation (363) satisfied by the retarded and advanced Green’s functions. That such a bitensor exists can be argued along the same lines as those presented in Section 4.3.5.

Equipped with we define the singular Green’s function to be

This comes with the propertiesGr.S1: satisfies the inhomogeneous wave equation,

Gr.S2: is symmetric in its indices and arguments,

Gr.S3: vanishes if is in the chronological past or future of ,

These can be established as consequences of Properties Gr.H1, Gr.H2, Gr.H3, and Gr.H4, and the properties of the retarded and advanced Green’s functions.

The radiative Green’s function is then defined by

and it comes with the propertiesGr.R1: satisfies the homogeneous wave equation,

Gr.R2: agrees with the retarded Green’s function if is in the chronological future of ,

Gr.R3: vanishes if is in the chronological past of ,

Those follow immediately from Properties Gr.S1, Gr.S2, and Gr.S3, and the properties of the retarded Green’s function.

When is restricted to the normal convex neighbourhood of , we have the explicit relations

From these we see clearly that the singular Green’s function does not distinguish between past and future (Property Gr.S2), and that its support excludes (Property Gr.S3). We see also that the radiative Green’s function coincides with in (Property Gr.R2), and that its support does not include (Property Gr.R3).

http://www.livingreviews.org/lrr-2004-6 |
© Max Planck Society
Problems/comments to |