In a first course on classical mechanics, when students encounter rotations, they are introduced to the idea of active and passive transformations. An active transformation would be to fix the origin and axis-orientations of a given coordinate system with respect to some external observer, and then move an object from one point to another point of the same coordinate system. A passive transformation would be to place an object so that it remains fixed with respect to some external observer, and then induce a rotation of the object with respect to a given coordinate system, by rotating the coordinate system itself with respect to the external observer. We will derive the Lie derivative of a vector by first performing an active transformation and then following this with a passive transformation and finding how the final vector differs from its original form. In the language of differential geometry, we will first “push-forward” the vector, and then subject it to a “pull-back”.

In the active, push-forward sense we imagine that there are two spacetime points connected by a smooth curve . Let the first point be at , and the second, nearby point at , i.e. ; that is,

where and is the tangent to the curve at . In the passive, pull-back sense we imagine that the coordinate system itself is changed to , but in the very special form It is in this last step that the Lie derivative differs from the covariant derivative. In fact, if we insert Equation (36) into Equation (38) we find the result . This is called “Lie-dragging” of the coordinate frame, meaning that the coordinates at are carried along so that at , and in the new coordinate system, the coordinate labels take the same numerical values.As an interesting aside it is worth noting that Arnold [10], only a little whimsically, refers to this construction as the “fisherman’s derivative”. He imagines a fisherman sitting in a boat on a river, “taking derivatives” as the boat moves with the current. Playing on this imagery, the covariant derivative is cast with the high-test Zebco parallel transport fishing pole, the Lie derivative with the Shimano, Lie-dragging ultra-light. Let us now see how Lie-dragging reels in vectors.

For some given vector field that takes values , say, along the curve, we write

for the value of at and for the value at . Because the two points and are infinitesimally close () and we can thus write for the value of at the nearby point and in the same coordinate system. However, in the new coordinate system at the nearby point, we find The Lie derivative now is defined to be where we have dropped the “” subscript and the last equality follows easily by noting .The Lie derivative of a covector is easily obtained by acting on the scalar for an arbitrary vector :

But, because is a scalar, and thus Since is arbitrary,We introduced in Equation (32) the effect of parallel transport on vector components. By contrast, the Lie-dragging of a vector causes its components to change as

We see that if , then the components of the vector do not change as the vector is Lie-dragged. Suppose now that represents a vector field and that there exists a corresponding congruence of curves with tangent given by . If the components of the vector field do not change under Lie-dragging we can show that this implies a symmetry, meaning that a coordinate system can be found such that the vector components will not depend on one of the coordinates. This is a potentially very powerful statement.Let represent the tangent to the curves drawn out by, say, the coordinate. Then we can write which means

If the Lie derivative of with respect to vanishes we find Using this in Equation (41) implies , that is to say, the vector field does not depend on the coordinate. Generally speaking, every that exists that causes the Lie derivative of a vector (or higher rank tensors) to vanish represents a symmetry.Let us take the spacetime metric as an example. A spacetime symmetry can be represented by a generating vector field such that

This is known as Killing’s equation, and solutions to this equation are naturally referred to as Killing vectors. As a particular case, let us consider the class of stationary, axisymmetric, and asymptotically flat spacetimes. These are highly relevant in the present context since they capture the physics of rotating, equilibrium configurations. In other words, the geometries that result are among the most fundamental, and useful, for the relativistic astrophysics of spinning black holes and neutron stars. Stationary, axisymmetric, and asymptotically flat spacetimes are such that [14]- there exists a Killing vector that is timelike at spatial infinity;
- there exists a Killing vector that vanishes on a timelike 2-surface (called the axis of symmetry), is spacelike everywhere else, and whose orbits are closed curves; and
- asymptotic flatness means the scalar products , , and tend to, respectively, , , and at spatial infinity.

These conditions imply [16] that a coordinate system exists where

So, for instance, the two Lie derivatives of the metric , say, are such that andhttp://www.livingreviews.org/lrr-2007-1 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.0 Germany License. Problems/comments to |