If our electromagnetic gauge field can be understood as a Kaluza–Klein vector, it turns out that it is possible to account for the entropy of the Reissner–Nordström black hole in essentially the same way as for the Kerr black hole . This mainly follows from the fact that the electric charge becomes an angular momentum in the higher-dimensional spacetime, which is on the same footing as the four-dimensional angular momentum lifted in the higher-dimensional spacetime.
As far as the logic goes, this assumption will not be required for any reasoning in Section 2, even though it will help to understand striking similarities between the effects of rotation and electric charge. The assumption will be a crucial input in order to formulate the Reissner–Nordström/CFT correspondence and its generalizations in Section 4 and further on. This assumption is not required for the Kerr/CFT correspondence and its (extremal or non-extremal) extensions, which are exclusively based on the axial symmetry of spinning black holes.
In order to make this idea more precise, it is important to study simple embeddings of the gauge field in higher-dimensional spacetimes as toy models for a realistic embedding. In asymptotically-flat spacetimes, let us introduce a fifth compact dimension , where is the length of the Kaluza–Klein circle and let us define.
These considerations can also be applied to black holes in anti-de Sitter spacetimes. However, the situation is more intricate because no consistent Kaluza–Klein reduction from five dimensions can give rise to the four-dimensional Einstein–Maxwell theory with cosmological constant . As a consequence, the four-dimensional Kerr–Newman–AdS black hole cannot be lifted to a solution of any five-dimensional theory. Rather, embeddings in eleven-dimensional supergravity exist, which are obtained by adding a compact seven-sphere [69, 109].
Therefore, in order to review the arguments for the Reissner–Nordström/CFT correspondence and its generalizations, it is necessary to discuss five-dimensional gravity coupled to matter fields. We will limit our arguments to the action (1) possibly supplemented by the Chern–Simons terms
Let us finally emphasize that even though the scale of the Kaluza–Klein direction is arbitrary as far as it allows one to perform the uplift (2), it is constrained by matter field couplings. For example, let us consider the toy model of a probe charged massive scalar field of charge in four dimensions, which is minimally coupled to the gauge field. The wave equation reads as
Living Rev. Relativity 15, (2012), 11
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.