Figure 1:
Demonstration of the solitonic nature of the (mini)boson star. Shown are snapshots of the magnitude squared of the complex scalar field for a headon collision of two identical miniboson stars. The interacting stars display an interference pattern as they pass through each other, recovering their individual identities after the collision. However, note that the BSs have a larger amplitude after their interaction and so are not true solitons. The collision can therefore be considered inelastic. Reprinted with permission from [49]. See also [141] (e.g., Figure 5.12). 

Figure 2:
Profiles characterizing static, spherically symmetric boson stars with a few different values of the central scalar field (top left). Reprinted with permission from [141]. 

Figure 3:
Left: The mass of the boson star as a function of the central value of the scalar field in adimensional units . Right: Maximum mass as a function of (squares) and the asymptotic relation of Eq. (52) (solid curve). Reprinted with permission from [57]; copyright by APS. 

Figure 4:
The compactness of a stable boson star (black solid line) as a function of the adimensional selfinteraction parameter . The compactness is shown for the most massive stable star (the most compact BS is unstable). This compactness asymptotes for to the value indicated by the red, dashed line. Also shown for comparison is the compactness of a Schwarzschild BH (green dotdashed line), and the maximum compactness of a nonspinning neutron star (blue dotted line). Reprinted with permission from [8]; copyright by IOP. 

Figure 5:
The mass (solid) and the number of particles (dashed) versus central scalar value for charged boson stars with four values of as defined in Section 3.3. The mostlyvertical lines crossing the four plots indicate the solution for each case with the maximum mass (solid) and maximum particle number (dashed). Reprinted with permission from [123]; copyright by Elsevier. 

Figure 6:
Top: Total mass (in units of ) and fundamental frequency of an oscillaton as a function of the central value of the scalar field . The maximum mass is . Bottom: Plot of the total mass versus the radius at which achieves its maximum. Reprinted with permission from [5]; copyright by IOP. 

Figure 7:
The scalar field in cylindrical coordinates for two rotating bosonstar solutions: (left) and (right) . The two solutions have roughly comparable amplitudes in scalar field. Note the toroidal shape. Reprinted with permission from [141]. 

Figure 8:
Left: The maximum of the central value of each of the two scalar fields constituting the multistate BS for the fraction , where defines the relative “amount” of each state. Right: The frequencies associated with each of the two states of the multistate BS. At , there is a flip in which the excited state (black solid) decays and the scalar field in the ground state (red dashed) becomes excited. Discussed in Section 3.7. Reprinted with permission from [25]; copyright by APS. 

Figure 9:
Oscillation frequencies of various boson stars are plotted against their mass. Also shown are the oscillation frequencies of unstable BSs obtained from the fully nonlinear evolution of the dynamical system. Unstable BSs are observed maintaining a constant frequency as they approach a stable star configuration. Reprinted with permission from [196]; copyright by APS. 

Figure 10:
The instability time scale of an excited boson star (the first excitation) to one of three end states: (i) decay to the ground state, (ii) collapse to a black hole, or (iii) dispersal. Reprinted with permission from [15]; copyright by APS. 

Figure 11:
Very long evolutions of a perturbed, slightly subcritical, boson star with differing outer boundaries. The central magnitude of the scalar field is shown. At early times ( and the middle frame), the boson star demonstrates nearcritical behavior with smallamplitude oscillations about an unstable solution. For late times (), the solution appears converged for the largest two outer boundaries and suggests that subcritical boson stars are not dispersing. Instead, they execute large amplitude oscillations about lowdensity boson stars. Reprinted with permission from [142]. 

Figure 12:
The evolution of (where is the energy density of the complex scalar field) with massive field (left) and massless (right). In the massive case, much of the scalar field collapses and a perturbed boson star is formed at the center, settling down by gravitational cooling. In the massless case, the scalar field bounces through the origin and then disperses without forming any compact object. Reprinted with permission from [198]; copyright by APS. 

Figure 13:
Collision of identical boson stars with large kinetic energy in the Newtonian limit. The total energy (i.e., the addition of kinetic, gravitational and selfinteraction) is positive and the collision displays solitonic behavior. Contrast this with the gravitydominated collision displayed in Figure 14. Reprinted with permission from [26]; copyright by APS. 

Figure 14:
Collision of identical boson stars with small kinetic energy in the Newtonian limit. The total energy is dominated by the gravitational energy and is therefore negative. The collision leads to the formation of a single, gravitationally bound object, oscillating with large perturbations. This contrasts with the large kinetic energy case (and therefore positive total energy) displayed in Figure 13. Reprinted with permission from [26]; copyright by APS. 

Figure 15:
The position of the center of one BS in a headon binary as a function of time for (i) [BB] identical BSs, (ii) [BpoB] opposite phase pair, and (iii) [BaB] a boson–antiboson pair. A simple argument is made, which qualitatively matches these numerical results, as discussed in Section 4.2. Also shown is the expected trajectory from a simple Newtonian twobody estimate. Reprinted with permission from [174]; copyright by APS. 

Figure 16:
The position of the center of one BS within an orbiting binary as a function of time for the two cases: (i) [BB] identical BSs and (ii) [BpoB] opposite phase pair. Notice that the orbits are essentially identical at early times (and large separations), but that they start to deviate from each other on closer approach. This is consistent with the internal structure of each member of the binary being irrelevant at large separations. Reprinted with permission from [173]; copyright by APS. 

Figure 17:
Evolution of a boson star (solid line) perturbed by a shell of scalar field (dashed line). Shown is the mass density for each contribution. By the real scalar field pulse has departed the central region and perturbed the boson star into an unstable, compact configuration. Contrast the frame with that of and note the increase in compaction. This unstable BS survives until only because the initial perturbation has been tuned to one part in and indicates Type I critical behavior. Reprinted with permission from [142]. 

Figure 18:
Evolutions of the headon collisions of identical boson stars boosted toward each other with initial Lorentz factors as indicated. Time flows downward within each column and the top edge displays the axis of symmetry. The colorscale indicates the value of . In the middle frames one sees the interference pattern characteristic of high kinetic energy BS collisions (as mentioned in Figure 1). In the last column on the right, the collision produces a BH with apparent horizon indicated by the black oval in the third frame. Reprinted with permission from [55]; copyright by APS. 
http://www.livingreviews.org/lrr20126 
Living Rev. Relativity 15, (2012), 6
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License. Email us: 