The following is understood to also apply for : By virtue of Eq. (8.2) – and the fact that the condition can be written as – the circularity problem is reduced to the following two tasks:

- (i)
- Show that implies .
- (ii)
- Establish from the stationary and axisymmetric matter equations.

(i) Since is a function, it is locally constant if its derivative vanishes. As vanishes on the rotation axis, this implies in every connected domain of spacetime intersecting the axis. (At this point it is worthwhile to recall that the corresponding step in the staticity theorem requires more effort: Concluding from that vanishes is more involved, since is a one-form. However, using the Stokes’ theorem to integrate an identity for the twist [152] shows that a strictly stationary – not necessarily simply connected – domain of outer communication must be static if is closed. While this proves the staticity theorem for vacuum and self-gravitating scalar fields [152], it does not solve the electrovacuum case. It should be noted that in the context of the proof of uniqueness the strictly stationary property follows from staticity [72] and not the other way around (compare Figure 3).

(ii) While follows from the symmetry conditions for electro-magnetic fields [43] and for scalar fields [150], it cannot be established for non-Abelian gauge fields [152]. This implies that the usual foliation of spacetime used to integrate the stationary and axisymmetric Maxwell equations is too restrictive to treat the EYM system. This is seen as follows: In Section 6.3 we have derived the formula (6.17). By virtue of Eq. (6.3) this becomes an expression for the derivative of the twist in terms of the electric Yang–Mills potential (defined with respect to the stationary Killing field ) and the magnetic one-form :

where is a suitably normalized trace (see Eq. (6.15)). Contracting this relation with the axial Killing field , and using again the fact that the Lie derivative of with respect to vanishes, yields immediately The difference between the Abelian and the non-Abelian case is due to the fact that the Maxwell equations automatically imply that the -component of vanishes, whereas this does not follow from the Yang–Mills equations. In fact, the Maxwell equation and the symmetry property imply the existence of a magnetic potential, , thus, . Moreover, the latter do not imply that the Lie algebra valued scalars and are orthogonal. Hence, circularity is an intrinsic property of the EM system, whereas it imposes additional requirements on non-Abelian gauge fields.Both staticity and circularity theorems can be established for scalar fields or, more generally, scalar mappings with arbitrary target manifolds: Consider, for instance, a self-gravitating scalar mapping with Lagrangian . The stress energy tensor is of the form

where the functions and may depend on , , the spacetime metric and the target metric . If is invariant under the action of a Killing field – in the sense that for each component of – then the one-form becomes proportional to : . By virtue of the Killing field identity (8.1), this implies that the twist of is closed. Hence, the staticity and the circularity issue for self-gravitating scalar mappings can be established, under appropriate conditions, as in the vacuum case. From this one concludes that (strictly) stationary non-rotating black-hole configuration of self-gravitating scalar fields are static if , while stationary and axisymmetric ones are circular if .
Living Rev. Relativity 15, (2012), 7
http://www.livingreviews.org/lrr-2012-7 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License. E-mail us: |